“Don’t give up the ship” is a phrase often associated with Captain James Lawrence, who reportedly spoke those words after being mortally wounded during a naval battle in the War of 1812. Though the slogan later became a symbol of perseverance in the U.S. Navy, Lawrence’s ship was ultimately captured — a reminder that inspirational language alone does not determine outcomes.
Recently, several Democratic lawmakers referenced that historic phrase in a short political video addressing members of the military and intelligence community. In the video, the lawmakers emphasized that service members have a duty to uphold the Constitution and stated that individuals are obligated to refuse unlawful orders.
The video was shared by Sen. Elissa Slotkin and features Sen. Mark Kelly along with Reps. Chris Deluzio, Chrissy Houlahan, Maggie Goodlander, and Jason Crow — all of whom have prior military or intelligence backgrounds. In their remarks, the group stressed that members of the armed forces and intelligence agencies take an oath to defend the Constitution and must act in accordance with the law.
Several of the lawmakers repeat the statement: “You can refuse illegal orders. You must refuse illegal orders,” underscoring long-standing legal principles within the U.S. military that personnel are not required to carry out unlawful commands. They frame their message as a reminder of constitutional obligations rather than as a call to political action.
The video also suggests that public servants may face challenging circumstances and difficult decisions. The lawmakers describe the current moment as one that requires vigilance from those serving in national security roles.
Critics of the video argue that its timing and tone carry political implications, suggesting it is indirectly aimed at President Donald Trump and his administration. Supporters, however, contend that reminding service members of their constitutional responsibilities is appropriate and consistent with established military law.
The exchange reflects broader political tensions in Washington, where debates over executive authority, constitutional limits, and the role of federal institutions continue to shape public discourse.