Kimberly Guilfoyle Asked to Resign as U.S. Ambassador to Greece Amid Misconduct Allegations
Kimberly Guilfoyle says her commitment to President Donald Trump will continue even as her tenure as U.S. ambassador to Greece comes to an end, following a White House request that she resign amid allegations involving her financial dealings and use of political connections.
White House press secretary Katie Zacharia announced Tuesday that the administration had asked Guilfoyle to step down. The announcement followed Trump’s comments a day earlier that he was considering removing her from the diplomatic post.
“We have asked Ambassador Guilfoyle to resign. She has been a wonderful asset to the team and we wish her well,” Zacharia said during her first White House press briefing.
Guilfoyle responded in a statement on X, defending her record and rejecting the allegations against her. The controversy follows reports that she allegedly asked a prominent Trump donor to pay a $100,000 personal credit card bill before her Senate confirmation hearing. Guilfoyle’s lawyers have disputed aspects of the reporting. citeturn734801search0turn734801search2
Guilfoyle Vows to Defend Her Reputation
In her statement, Guilfoyle acknowledged that her time as ambassador could be ending but emphasized that her political loyalties remained unchanged.
“While my time as Ambassador may be coming to an end, my commitment to President Trump, the America First movement, and the country I love will never end,” she wrote.
She also directly addressed the misconduct allegations, calling them false and promising to defend her reputation.
“I will not allow false accusations to define my decades of public service,” Guilfoyle said.
Her response came after several reports scrutinized her dealings with political donors and private individuals during the period surrounding her appointment and diplomatic service in Greece.
$100,000 Credit Card Payment Allegation
The central allegation concerns Trump donor Eric Deters, who said Guilfoyle asked him in July 2025 to pay approximately $100,000 toward her American Express bill shortly before her Senate confirmation hearing.
According to reporting by The Wall Street Journal, messages between the two allegedly included discussions about payment and Guilfoyle’s ability to help Deters with legal and tax matters through her connections in the administration.
Deters did not make the requested payment. He characterized the alleged arrangement as an exchange of financial assistance for access to government officials.
Guilfoyle’s lawyer has challenged the reporting, including the authenticity of the messages. Her representatives have also disputed Deters’ account of their financial relationship, arguing that he owed her money for speaking and consulting services. The allegations have not been established as criminal wrongdoing. citeturn734801search1turn734801news30
Trump Had Signaled He Was Considering Her Removal
Trump told reporters Monday that the administration was reviewing Guilfoyle’s position and expressed dissatisfaction with the situation.
“Well, we’re looking at it. Yeah, we’re not happy,” he said when asked about the allegations.
The White House’s announcement followed days of scrutiny over reports concerning Guilfoyle’s dealings with donors and other private individuals. The State Department’s Office of Inspector General has also launched an investigation into her conduct, according to reporting by The Washington Post. citeturn734801search2turn734801search10
The administration has not publicly detailed the findings of that investigation. Guilfoyle has denied wrongdoing and says she intends to defend herself against the allegations.
Guilfoyle’s Political Ties to Trump
Guilfoyle is a longtime Trump ally and the former fiancée of Donald Trump Jr. Before becoming ambassador to Greece, she worked as a television personality and Republican political fundraiser and was a prominent supporter of Trump’s political campaigns.
Her appointment placed her in a diplomatic role at a time when Washington was seeking to strengthen relations with Greece, a NATO member with strategic importance in the Eastern Mediterranean.
The resignation request marks a significant development in Guilfoyle’s diplomatic career, although it does not resolve the underlying allegations. Her departure and the outcome of the inspector general’s inquiry remain separate matters.
What Happens Next?
The White House has asked Guilfoyle to resign, but the public announcement did not provide a detailed timetable for her departure or explain what further action might follow.
The inspector general’s investigation could clarify questions about her conduct, including whether any ethics rules were violated. Until findings are released, the allegations and Guilfoyle’s denials remain central to the dispute.
Guilfoyle has made clear that the controversy will not change her support for Trump or the America First movement. Her immediate diplomatic future, however, is in question as the administration responds to the scrutiny surrounding her tenure.
Read More: Democratic Lawmaker Resigns Amid Ongoing Federal Legal Proceedings
Democratic Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (FL-20) has formally resigned from the U.S. House of Representatives, with her resignation taking effect Tuesday at 1:30 p.m. EDT. Her departure comes amid an ongoing federal case and a congressional ethics review that has placed renewed attention on campaign finance rules, the use of federal relief funds, and accountability among elected officials. The resignation also adds to a series of recent departures from Congress involving lawmakers facing legal proceedings or ethics-related scrutiny.
As my colleague Frank Bruno reported late last month, an eight-member bipartisan subcommittee of the House Ethics Committee worked late into the night reviewing Cherfilus-McCormick’s conduct. The congresswoman faced allegations involving more than $5 million in federal disaster relief funds connected to a family business, with prosecutors alleging that a significant portion of the money was directed toward her 2022 congressional campaign. The case has drawn attention to the legal requirements governing federal assistance programs, campaign contributions, and financial disclosures by candidates seeking public office.
On Friday, the House Ethics Committee announced that, following approximately seven hours of deliberations, the subcommittee found “clear and convincing” evidence supporting 25 of the 27 allegations under review. Those findings could have moved the matter closer to a potential expulsion vote in the House of Representatives. Although the ethics proceedings represent a significant development, the committee’s conclusions should be distinguished from the separate federal criminal case, and allegations must be described in accordance with the relevant legal proceedings.
Throughout the controversy, Cherfilus-McCormick challenged the allegations and raised concerns about the treatment of her case, including claims of racial and gender bias. The dispute has highlighted broader questions about how congressional ethics investigations are conducted, how lawmakers respond to allegations of misconduct, and what standards should apply when elected officials face serious legal challenges. Her resignation now shifts attention toward the next steps in the federal case and the possible consequences for her political future.
Following the ethics subcommittee’s findings, Cherfilus-McCormick may also have faced the prospect of a difficult vote among House members if proceedings toward expulsion continued. Under House rules, expelling a member requires a two-thirds vote, making bipartisan support essential to such a decision. Rather than wait for the process to advance further, she submitted her formal resignation letter to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) ahead of a possible expulsion vote. Her departure leaves questions about the broader political implications of the case and how Congress will address other pending ethics matters.
READ MORE:
Her resignation comes amid a series of departures involving three lawmakers: Cherfilus-McCormick, former Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell of California, and Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas. Their exits have intensified discussion about congressional oversight, political accountability, and the standards expected of elected representatives. Meanwhile, Republican Rep. Corey Mills of Florida is also facing calls for disciplinary action, potentially extending the recent period of uncertainty surrounding the House’s membership and internal proceedings.
Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) introduced a resolution seeking Mills’ expulsion following allegations involving domestic violence, sexual misconduct, claims concerning his military service, and the handling of federal contracts. Mills’ situation remains a separate matter, and the allegations should not be treated as established facts without appropriate findings or legal determinations. Whether the resolution receives sufficient Republican support remains uncertain. The developments nevertheless underscore the importance of transparent investigations, due process, and consistent ethical standards for public officials, regardless of party affiliation.
READ ALSO : Michigan Senate Race Tightens: New Poll Reveals Neck-and-Neck Contest
Ilhan Omar Accuses Trump Administration of Political Intimidation After Federal Agents Search Her Home
Rep. Ilhan Omar condemned President Donald Trump’s administration on Monday after federal agents searched her Washington, D.C., home as part of an ongoing criminal investigation, accusing the government of weaponizing law enforcement against political opponents.
The Minnesota Democrat responded on X after agents from Homeland Security Investigations arrived at her residence early Monday morning. The Justice Department confirmed that investigators had executed a court-authorized search warrant but did not disclose details about the investigation.
“I’m ok. Make no mistake: this is an attempt to target political enemies and weaponize federal law enforcement,” Omar wrote. She also accused Trump of directing years of attacks against her and declared, “I will not be silenced.”
The search, conducted weeks before the November 3 midterm elections, has intensified political tensions in Washington as Omar seeks reelection to the House. Federal authorities have not publicly outlined the specific allegations under investigation. (Associated Press; CBS News)
Justice Department Confirms Court-Authorized Search
Homeland Security Investigations agents arrived at Omar’s Washington-area residence at approximately 6 a.m., according to reports from Fox News and other outlets.
A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed that investigators carried out a search warrant obtained through the department, describing the operation as part of an ongoing federal criminal investigation.
Authorities have not publicly specified what evidence they sought, what materials were seized or whether any charges are being considered. The execution of a search warrant does not, by itself, establish that a crime occurred.
Reports Link Investigation to Immigration Paperwork
Fox News Digital reported that the investigation concerns alleged fraud involving immigration paperwork completed by Omar’s late father when she was a child. The Justice Department has not publicly confirmed those details or provided a full account of the allegations.
The search follows public comments by administration officials about an investigation involving Omar. In September, border czar Tom Homan acknowledged that a criminal investigation was underway.
Omar has denied wrongdoing and previously said she had not been contacted by federal authorities about an investigation. The precise scope of the inquiry remains unclear based on the information publicly released by the Justice Department. (CBS News; The Washington Post)
Omar Says Search Is Part of a Political Campaign Against Her
In her social media statement, Omar framed the search as the latest escalation in what she described as a prolonged effort by Trump to intimidate her.
“For ten years, Trump has targeted me with baseless lies and smear campaigns,” she wrote, adding that she would continue speaking out despite the search.
Omar, a prominent progressive Democrat who represents Minnesota’s 5th Congressional District, has frequently clashed with Trump and other Republican leaders. Her immigration background and political positions have repeatedly made her a target of criticism from the president and his allies.
Her allegation that the search was politically motivated has not been established as fact. Federal officials have described the operation as part of an ongoing criminal investigation but have not publicly explained its timing or provided detailed evidence supporting the reported focus of the probe.
Search Draws Scrutiny Ahead of Midterm Elections
The timing of the search has raised questions among Democrats because it occurred shortly before the midterm elections, when Omar is campaigning for another term in Congress.
Senior Democrats criticized the action and questioned whether the timing was consistent with longstanding Justice Department practices intended to avoid investigative steps that could improperly influence elections. Such concerns do not, on their own, establish that the search was politically directed.
Republicans and administration officials have previously called for scrutiny of Omar’s background, while Omar has consistently rejected allegations of immigration fraud.
The investigation’s next steps remain uncertain. The Justice Department has not publicly released further details about the evidence sought during Monday’s search or announced criminal charges in connection with the reported allegations.
For now, the search has placed Omar at the center of a new political and legal dispute just weeks before voters head to the polls, with key questions about the investigation still unanswered.
Benjamin Harris is a RapidReports front page contributor and editor,proud father of four.
